 |

|
 |

Press Releases & Updates 2001
25th September 2001
Activist Uses Police TV Interview in Big Blockade Trial
Magistrate Told: "Your job is to keep humanity running."
|
At his trial today in Helensburgh District Court on a breach of the peace
charge connected to the Big Blockade of Faslane nuclear weapon base in
February, an activist used a network TV clip in which a senior police
officer claimed that the base had not been disrupted by the action.
Andrew Gray (33), a librarian from Newcastle and a Green Party candidate in
June’s general election, said that the Crown had produced no evidence that
his action had caused disruption. In the TV clip, shot as part of a
newscast on the day, Superintendent Harry Bunch of Strathclyde Police makes
the claim that the base was able to continue its work as normal.
Andrew pointed out that the terrorist attack on the US showed that we must
consider what the end and outcome is of political ideas and plans for mass
murder, like Trident. He told JP Fraser Gillies that while the police were
under instruction to keep the base running he, as a Justice of the Peace,
had a choice. His job was not to keep the base running but to keep humanity
running. Andrew was fined £250 -JP Gillies’ standard tariff for such
charges. Andrew is considering an appeal.
Teacher Charlie McInally (52), from Glasgow, was given the same treatment
for an alleged Big Blockade breach of the peace. Chris Brock (23), a
volunteer at the Cyrenian hostel for the homeless near Edinburgh, fared
rather better. His fine of £150 took into account the fact that he had no
income.
Michael Pettersson (20), had traveled from his home in Sweden to face trial
today, also on a Big Blockade charge of breach of the peace. He informed JP
Gillies that a Sheriff in Dumbarton had simply admonished an activist on
this charge. He was also fined £150.
David Mackenzie said: "In sentencing Chris and Michael JP Gillies has for
the first time in our experience taken account of people’s means. We are
grateful for this small mercy but look forward to the day when he pays real
attention to the substance of the defence case. Unlike other local
magistrates he does not retire to consider the verdict, nor does he appear
to take the Clerk’s advice - an essential step for a lay justice dealing
with cases that are often legally complex."
|  |

Search the Website |
|
|
 |
|