 |

|
 |

Press Releases & Updates 2001
5th November 2001
Trident Ploughshares’ Formal Complaint Re "Parasites" Slur
|
The Trident Ploughshares campaign has complained formally to a senior
Scottish judge about the behaviour of Sheriff Ronald Smith in dealing with
an anti-Trident case when he referred to peace protesters as "parasites".
The Sheriff’s bizarre remark was made in Dumbarton Sheriff Court on 29th
October as he fined Ludwig Appeltans and Harriet Jones £200 each for
cutting the perimeter fence at the Coulport nuclear missile store in August
this year. He said: "I look upon you so-called peace protesters as
parasites, causing untold damage to fences, disrupting the base and wasting
this country’s money which could be spent elsewhere."
The campaign letter to the Lord President of the Court of Session, who is
responsible for the administration of Sheriff Courts in Scotland, seeks a
withdrawal of the remark and an apology and says: "The nature of our
campaign means that we have frequent court experience. We are deeply
distressed and indignant at the continuing and shameful failure of the
Scottish justice system to address the criminality of the UK state in its
active and threatening deployment of Trident and while some magistrates and
sheriffs do deal with our cases with a level of professionalism and
courtesy, we meet with a good deal of incompetence and bias. This remark by
Sheriff Smith is however of a different order. It reveals an appalling
level of prejudice allied to grievous personal vilification. His diatribe
encompasses thousands of people he has never met and knows nothing about.
It is a flagrant abuse of his judicial privilege."
Meanwhile concern about the competence and even-handedness of the local
courts was again expressed after a Sheriff at Dumbarton Court found Jenny
Gaiawyn, a marine biology student in her early twenties at Bangor
University, guilty of a breach of the peace for her part in the Big
Blockade in February. The Sheriff deferred sentence for social enquiry
reports and refused to negotiate on the date for Jenny’s recall. Jenny
said: "We show what respect we can to the courts but today I got none in
return. The Sheriff dismissed my defence arguments without considering them
and would not let me explain that the recall date she demanded was right in
the middle of my practical exams." When Jenny tried to make her point she
was told to leave under a threat of contempt of court. She stood her
ground, as did supporters in the public seats, and the court officials then
abandoned the courtroom.
|  |

Search the Website |
|
|
 |
|