 |

|
 |

Press Releases & Updates 2001
12th November 2001
Another Scottish Parliament Demonstrator Acquitted
Remaining Cases Should be Dropped, Say Campaigners
|
Today another of the activists who took part in the anti-Trident
demonstration in the Scottish Parliament on 5th April was acquitted at
Edinburgh Sheriff Court.
Leesa French, from Edinburgh, was facing a breach of the peace charge
before Sheriff Mhairi Stephen, for her part in the demonstration which
caused a ten-minute suspension of First Minister’s Questions. Leesa was one
of 12 people who hung banners, sang peace songs and demanded that the
Parliament address the question of Trident.
The Crown case consisted of the evidence of gallery attendants at the
Parliament and a police officer, along with the official parliamentary
video which covered the demonstration. One of the gallery attendants said
she got a bit of a fright when the demonstration took place, but only
because it was her first day in that job and she did not know what to
expect. At the conclusion of the Crown case defence solicitor Joanna
McDonald submitted that there was "no case to answer". She argued that
there was no evidence of a breach of the peace. The witnesses had all
agreed that the demonstration was peaceful and the video confirmed this.
Joanna referred to the High Court’s clarification of the criteria for the
breach of the peace charge in the Smith v Donnelly appeal. The prosecution
had to show that real alarm or distress had been caused, or were likely.
Sheriff Stephen agreed. It was clear that there had been a breach of the
"decorum" in the rules of the Scottish parliament but it was also clear
that there had been no breach of the peace.
Of the four demonstrators who have so far been tried only one, Jane
Tallents, has been found guilty and she has appealed the verdict, while
Elinor Mackenzie was found not guilty and the charge against Ulla Roder was
Not Proven.
David Mackenzie said: "By this time it should be obvious to the Procurator
Fiscal that Edinburgh Sheriffs are less and less likely to treat this
demonstration as a criminal matter, especially after the Smith v Donnelly
appeal. The Crown has now a clear responsibility to put an end to this
waste of public money and drop the remaining seven cases."
|  |

Search the Website |
|
|
 |
|