
Press Releases & Updates 1998
29th September 1998
International Trident Submarine Disarmers Admonished
Local Court Still In Muddle Over International Law
|
Today in Helensburgh District Court Katri Silvonen, Hanna Jarvinen and
Krista van Velzen were found guilty and admonished on charges relating to
their direct disarmament actions during the August phase of the Trident
Ploughshares 2000 campaign at Faslane and Coulport.
All the defendants said they were on their way to disarm a weapon of mass
destruction and were acting to uphold international law. "Under the
Nuremberg Principles," said Hanna," I have a right if not a duty to prevent
the crime that is happening at Faslane".
Katri said: "Britain’s Trident nuclear weapons system is a crime against
humanity and it is my duty as a global citizen to take action. I belong to
Finland, a nuclear-free country, but that does not protect me - radiation
does not recognise borders." When asked by the Procurator Fiscal if he had
been given authority to enter the nuclear base she said:" I was not given
permission by the authorities in Faslane but I have been given that right
by the previous War Crimes Tribunals."
Supporters were full of admiration for the clarity, dignity and courage
with which the women gave their testimony in a court that was foreign to
them and whose business was not conducted in their mother tongue. Justice
of The Peace Tony Stirling obviously agreed and congratulated them on a
well -presented and very interesting case.
Expert witness Glen Rangwala, a specialist in International Law from
Cambridge University pointed out that the International Court of Justice’s
Advisory Opinion of 1996, by which the UK government’s position on nuclear
weapons is illegal, " . .is the highest statement of customary law that we
have." In spite of being given "cause for thought" JP Stirling said he had
no alternative but to disregard the arguments from international law for to
do otherwise would mean that he would have to accept that the UK Government
were committing War Crimes! He put himself in a thoroughly contradictory
position by saying that the case might be argued in the High Court.
Clearly, if Helensburgh District Court finds itself unable to deal with
arguments so central to the defence of the TP2000 activists, it has no
business hearing their cases and wasting everybody’s time. JP Stirling’s
verdict also flew in the face of the prosecution’s failure to establish
beyond a reasonable doubt that their intention was to commit crime.
Earlier fellow TP2000 activist Helen John was fined £180 for her
disarmament action. Having been given 6 months to pay she is free like the
other three women and able to put the traumatic events at Cornton Vale
Prison behind her.
Meanwhile the case of Angie Zelter, Tracy Hart and Sylvia Boyes, charged
with stealing the Ministry of Defence boat which they borrowed for a
citizens’ inspection has been adjourned to the 16th October because an MOD
witness did not turn up. The MOD’s reluctance to describe that incident in
open court is quite understandable.
|