 |

|
 |

Press Releases & Updates 2000
28th September 2000
Key Preliminary Hearing Tomorrow For Review of Trident Three Ruling
Claim that High Court Review Breaches European Convention
|
A panel of judges at the High Court in Edinburgh tomorrow will hear
submissions from the interested parties on vital factors relating to the
Lord Advocate’s Reference of the ruling of Sheriff Gimblett in Greenock
last October when she acquitted three nuclear disarmers.
The activists are hoping that tomorrow’s 2 p.m. preliminary hearing in the
High Court of Justiciary will promote the re-phrasing of the questions set
in the Reference, so that the issues central to the Greenock trial, i.e.,
the legality of Trident and the right of citizens to act to prevent
breaches of international humanitarian law, can be dealt with. The
interested parties will argue that the whole process of the Reference
contradicts the European Convention on Human Rights. They hope also that a
number of practical requirements will be met, such as the provision of
reasonable costs to one of the women, Angie Zelter, who is representing
herself.
Meanwhile the Procurator Fiscal’s office in Dumbarton has again shown
bizarre inconsistency in its handling of Trident Ploughshares cases. Marjan
Willemsen (23), from the Netherlands, currently at Faslane Peace Camp,
sought and was granted at Dumbarton Sheriff Court, without objection from
the Fiscal, an adjournment of her trial on a breach of the peace charge
until the High Court Ruling on the Lord Advocate’s Reference is available.
This is in contrast to the Fiscal’s strenuous objection to such
adjournments in a welter of Trident Ploughshares cases at District Court
level in recent months, including the plea for adjournment by Angie Zelter
of a breach of the peace trial relating to the "Crimebusters" blockade of
Faslane naval base in February. Angie is now petitioning the High Court for
this adjournment.
A Trident Ploughshares spokesperson said:
"We strongly suspect that the attitude of the Dumbarton Procurator Fiscal
on adjournments in the light of the upcoming Lord Advocate’s Reference has
been determined more by his anxiety about Ploughshares cases clogging up
the local courts than by any understanding of legal process."
|  |

Search the Website |
|
|
 |
|